Użytkownik Mummi Autotechu porównuje w tym poście wersję na STX\'ach do wersji BMS + Beyma 12BR70
I bought the STX-equipped Mummies a year ago, and then converted to a new pair of their Beyma(12BR70)/BMS(4524) siblings last month.
(for others it may concern as well)
The STX Mummies took some time to break-in, or so I felt, and initially sported some issues with the lower mids/upper bass where some deeper voices and instruments sounded too congested and resonant. After some 6 months it was a no-issue, and what "remained" was a present, lively, coherent, and very "tight" sound. Low end was a bit lean, and rolled of quickly below 45Hz or so, but most importantly the lows were taut/agile and well defined. Mids were very present, physical, textural, and "full" - though marred at times slightly in the upper mids being a wee bit too lively. Highs were clean and effortless, if lacking a bit in extension and reverberation/differentiation. Soundstage was free of the speakers, and in all very satisfying.
The Beyma/BMS Mummies, in their present broke-in state, have an overall gentler nature, and appears the more sonically balanced of the two. Lows are more present and physical, a bit deeper, though still very taut and nimble. The mids are very well integrated with the bass(and highs), and are more firmly presented here than via the STX Mummies; the midrange seems more corehent and tightly woven to my ears, with voices sounding very realistically of-a-piece - more informative, I\'d say, even though the mids are not as outwardly "expressive" as the STX Mummies. Highs are natural and effortless, as being extremely well defined and extended without calling attention to themselves. The amount of minute detail and variation they\'re able to retrieve from the material is very inspiring, and most be part of the reason for the very attentive overall sound where one notices the subtle inflections of a voice, etc. The soundstage is, again, free of the speakers, but with the "depth of field"(which is indeed quite impressive) more noticable here.
In all I\'d call the Beyma/BMS Mummies the more precise as well as organic sounding Mummy iteration. Their rather outspoken balance lends a great insight into the variations of different recordings, and exposes contrasts in a startling fashion. They\'re the monitors of the two, I\'d say, but perhaps not in the "usual" sense in that they always re-direct the attention to the holistic an intrinsically musical aspect.
The STX Mummies are the more outwardly sprightful of the two, and they\'re just extremely enjoyable to listen to: speedy, present, lively, and fun. As such I can imagine there are those who\'d prefer them for this ability or even temperament of theirs, and end up combining them with a sub(or two) to get the fullness in the lows.
Not in any way to make it sound as if the Beyma/BMS Mummies are dull sounding; no way. But they\'re more observative, in a way, less inclined to call attention to themselves, and I find this an honest quality where one listenes through them more effectively. Conclusively I find they\'re the more complete sounding speakers being that they cover more material with better insight, are tonally more balanced, and are less restricted in the frequency range.
